<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 things I want to know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burndowneasy.com/10-things-i-want-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burndowneasy.com/10-things-i-want-to-know/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Gurus SEO Bolton</title>
		<link>http://www.burndowneasy.com/10-things-i-want-to-know/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Gurus SEO Bolton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burndowneasy.com/?p=96#comment-296</guid>
		<description>I think the bad neighbourhood thing is definitely over-rated. I also think that it has to rely on outbound links from your site rather than inbound ones because, as said, it would be open to competitor abuse if not. You would have to be linking out to some pretty spammy link farms or something to actually be penalised by the big G imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bad neighbourhood thing is definitely over-rated. I also think that it has to rely on outbound links from your site rather than inbound ones because, as said, it would be open to competitor abuse if not. You would have to be linking out to some pretty spammy link farms or something to actually be penalised by the big G imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Inertia</title>
		<link>http://www.burndowneasy.com/10-things-i-want-to-know/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Inertia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burndowneasy.com/?p=96#comment-19</guid>
		<description>if you&#039;ve got a couple of spare hours check out this thread at WPW: http://www.webproworld.com/google-discussion-forum/68650-can-inbound-links-really-hurt-you.html

My conclusion was: 

&quot;It IS possible but damned hard! And IF you are penalised because of your own or a competitors link building spamming actions then it is possible to reverse the effect with some work and dialogue with Google. But in the grand scheme of things it&#039;s not something we should worry about.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you&#8217;ve got a couple of spare hours check out this thread at WPW: <a href="http://www.webproworld.com/google-discussion-forum/68650-can-inbound-links-really-hurt-you.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.webproworld.com/google-discussion-forum/68650-can-inbound-links-really-hurt-you.html</a></p>
<p>My conclusion was: </p>
<p>&#8220;It IS possible but damned hard! And IF you are penalised because of your own or a competitors link building spamming actions then it is possible to reverse the effect with some work and dialogue with Google. But in the grand scheme of things it&#8217;s not something we should worry about.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lindop</title>
		<link>http://www.burndowneasy.com/10-things-i-want-to-know/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lindop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burndowneasy.com/?p=96#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more inclined to believe links will just be devalued, rather than any chance of a full site/page ban. Otherwise it would be open to competitor abuse. Besides, the difficulty would be defining what is a bad neighbourhood... it&#039;s such an wide term.

Yeah, I&#039;ve been watching that website closely creep up the SERPs ;) I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more inclined to believe links will just be devalued, rather than any chance of a full site/page ban. Otherwise it would be open to competitor abuse. Besides, the difficulty would be defining what is a bad neighbourhood&#8230; it&#8217;s such an wide term.</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve been watching that website closely creep up the SERPs ;) I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Towers</title>
		<link>http://www.burndowneasy.com/10-things-i-want-to-know/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>David Towers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burndowneasy.com/?p=96#comment-6</guid>
		<description>This looks good David, looking forward to seeing your posts... A couple of points:

Bad Neighbourhoods - Are you going to try and burn down a site by giving it a bad link neighbourhood!?

URL - Have you seen been keeping an eye on recent test done for SEO Manchester by www.seomanchester.org.uk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks good David, looking forward to seeing your posts&#8230; A couple of points:</p>
<p>Bad Neighbourhoods &#8211; Are you going to try and burn down a site by giving it a bad link neighbourhood!?</p>
<p>URL &#8211; Have you seen been keeping an eye on recent test done for SEO Manchester by <a href="http://www.seomanchester.org.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomanchester.org.uk</a> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
